We recommend the stack that fits your team— not ours.
The platforms below are what we work with daily. We don't push a preferred stack onto a client; we choose based on your constraints, your team's familiarity and the problem in front of us.
Why the wrong stack costs more than the wrong price
Most vendors pick a stack once and quote every project the same way, whether it's a five-page marketing site or a real-time trading dashboard. That's resume-driven development dressed up as expertise — the tool fits the vendor's comfort, not your problem.
The cost shows up two years in: a marketing site built on a heavyweight framework nobody on your team can maintain, or a lightweight prototype stack straining under production load it was never sized for. By then the rewrite conversation starts, and it starts from a worse position than day one.
We write the stack decision down before a line of code, against your team's fluency, your real load and your three-year cost — not ours. If the honest answer is a framework we don't specialise in, we say so in writing.
Our stack promise
What you get regardless of which stack fits.
A written reason for every technology choice, not a house preference
Sized for the traffic you'll actually have, not a demo's
Open-source defaults by default — no vendor lock-in on the license
We'll recommend against our own preference if yours genuinely fits better
At a glance
- Technology categoriesFrontend to testing & QA
- 6
- Technologies coveredAcross every category
- 33+
- Reasoning documentedFor every recommendation
- 100%
- Vendor lock-inOpen-source defaults
- 0%
Four questions before any stack decision
Every recommendation comes as a written note that answers these four questions for your project. It saves the weeks that stack debates usually cost, and in year three the reasoning matters more than the framework name.
Your team's fluency
A team that knows Postgres builds better on Postgres than on a database they are learning under deadline. We start from who will maintain the system in year three.
The load it must carry
Transactional ledgers, real-time dashboards and ingest-heavy pipelines want different stacks. We size for the traffic you will have, not the traffic a demo has.
Total cost, not licence cost
Hosting, hiring and upgrade paths are part of the bill. Open-source, well-staffed stacks usually win for Indian SMEs on the three-year number.
Compliance and longevity
Audit logs, encryption and vendor support horizons decide whether a stack survives an inspection or a framework's end of life. We write the reasoning down.
Frontend
7 technologies
SEO-ready, type-safe interfaces that stay fast under real traffic, built on a shared design system your team can extend without us. It's the difference between a site that ranks and loads in under 2.5 seconds, and one that looks fine in a demo and disappears from search.
Mobile
4 technologies
One codebase for Android & iOS with native modules only where the platform demands it, so a feature doesn't ship twice, six weeks apart. It's what lets a small team maintain a polished app on both stores without doubling the engineering headcount.
Backend
8 technologies
APIs and workflow engines that hold up under real transactional load, with documented contracts your next developer can read without asking us. Designed for the traffic you'll actually have in year two, not the traffic a demo survives.
Database
4 technologies
Data modeled for your access patterns — indexed, backed up and migrated without downtime, because a slow query discovered at 10× scale is a Monday-morning outage, not a benchmark. Every schema decision comes with the reasoning written down.
Cloud & Infra
5 technologies
Infrastructure as code with monitoring, security hardening and 24×7 incident response, so a deploy is routine rather than a hope. Nothing depends on one engineer's memory of how the server was configured three years ago.
Testing & QA
5 technologies
Automated unit, e2e and API regression suites — every release ships with proof it works, not a developer's word for it. The suite lives in your repo and keeps protecting releases long after we've moved on.
We evaluate every project on its own merits — team skills, scalability needs, timeline, and budget — and pick the right tool for the job.
Not sure which stack you need?
Tell us your goals and constraints and we'll recommend a stack in writing — no charge, no obligation, and no bias toward the tools we happen to like.
Book a scoping call with a software architect — not a sales bot.
You'll get a reply within one business day. We'll send a rough estimate in 3 days and a fixed proposal in 7.
Prefer to talk first? Phone, email and office address are on the contact page.